Articles in this section are primarily provided directly by the companies appearing or PR agencies which are solely responsible for the content. The companies concerned may use the above content on their respective web sites provided they link back to http://www.ameinfo.com

Any opinions, advice, statements, offers or other information expressed in this section of the AMEinfo.com Web site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited. AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited is not responsible or liable for the content, accuracy or reliability of any material, advice, opinion or statement in this section of the AMEinfo.com Web site.

For details about submitting your stories, please read the guide - all content published is subject to our terms and conditions

On launch (which is rare for me, I only do that a couple of times a year); and again: great game. Possibly with a bit more to think about this time; we’ll see whether or not my brain returns to the game much over the coming months.

My first question: what effects of the aforementioned talk can we see in the final product? On a basic level, they seem to have executed solidly: the performance problems from the first game are gone (there are twisting corridors in some of the levels that exist only to allow upcoming areas to stream in, but they’re never long enough to be annoying), and the sequel was released two years and two months after the original, which suggests that they only had a slight slip in their schedule. In fact, they may not have slipped at all—BioWare released team is getting a lot of mileage out of having your character’s decisions persist from one game to the next, and they’ve shown that they can produce a game in the series in a couple of years. So: chalk up one success for lean!

Read more...